登录注册
登录
密 码
找回密码
  • 在线广播
  • 英语语法
  • 网络电视
  • 论坛帮助
我的快捷通道
  • 论坛
高级
下拉
注册
  • 用户名
  • Email
最新帖子 精华区 统计排行

基本信息

到访IP统计

管理团队

管理操作

在线会员

会员排行

版块排行

帖子排行

招生招聘求职 英语广播专题 外语人才招聘信息发布 英语考试论坛 外语简历求职信息发布 英文音乐交流区
隐藏 快速浏览
英语学习论坛
英语综合讨论区 英文音乐交流区 英语电影交流区 英语角English Corner
英语广播专题
BBC英语学习讨论区 VOA英语学习讨论区 CNN英语学习讨论区
英语考试论坛
四级六级 专四专八 雅思IELTS 托福TOEFL/新托福IBT 托业TOEIC 剑桥商务英语BEC GRE/GMAT 上海口译考试 PETS等其他
法语学习论坛
法语综合讨论区 法语考试讨论区 RFI法语广播讨论区
德语学习论坛
德语综合讨论区 德语考试讨论区 德国之声讨论区
小语种学习论坛
日语学习与交流 韩语学习与交流 西班牙语学习与交流 俄语学习与交流
招生招聘求职
外语人才招聘信息发布 外语简历求职信息发布 院校培训招生信息发布
维奥小镇工会
小镇议事厅 维奥小镇官方公告栏 意见、建议与问题反馈 飞达广播网问题反馈 飞达电视网问题反馈 版主申请栏 休闲灌水区 交友天地 广告专区
维奥小镇 » 英语角English Corner » Guo meimei and China Red Cross scandal
上一主题下一主题
新 帖
主题 : Guo meimei and China Red Cross scandal
使用道具┊ 复制链接 ┊浏览器收藏┊打印
yuanyuan 离线
级别: 游侠
显示用户信息 
UID: 2011
精华: 0
发帖: 8
铜币: 8 枚
威望: 2 点
贡献值: 0 点
银元: 0 个
在线时间: 0(时)
注册时间: 2011-07-06
最后登录: 2011-07-08
楼主  发表于: 2011-07-08   
倒序阅读 ┊  只看楼主 ┊  小 中 大

Guo meimei and China Red Cross scandal

 
本文的一些注解
lavish lifestyle 奢侈的生活方式
revelation  revel 的名词形式,揭露,曝光的意思
mainstream 主流,和中文完全对照翻译
credibility 信誉,可信度
the Chinese Communist Party 中国*****
smother 是什么窒息,扼杀
provocateur坐探,挑衅者
sprawling villa蔓延的别墅,指别墅大,就像迷宫一样蜿蜒曲折
flock 大量进入
benevolent 善意的,仁慈的
ubiquitous普遍存在的
for-profit activities为赢利为目标的活动
thought-provoking令人深思
succinctly简洁地
jarring opinion刺激的观点
文章链接http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/mobile/world-asia-pacific-14026592
http://edition.cnn.hu/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/07/06/china.redcross/index.html?iref=mpstoryview
 
Businessman quits amid China Red Cross scandal
 
05 July 11 08:04 ET

A businessman on the board of a company with ties to China's Red Cross Society has resigned amid a charity scandal.
Wang Jun quit after his girlfriend was accused of using charity money to fund a lavish lifestyle, state media said.

Guo Meimei, 20, claimed on her blog to be the "commerce general manager" of the Red Cross and boasted about her purchases of luxury cars and handbags.

The Red Cross has dismissed the claims as "pure fantasy" and said Ms Guo had no connection to the charity.
The charity's spokesman Martin Faller said the stories that first circulated online about the possible misuse of donated money had no substance.

But he said it was important for the Red Cross to use the current situation "to become even better", the state-run China Daily quoted him as saying.

Damaged reputation
Guo Meimei uploaded photographs of herself next to a luxury car on her blog last month, raising questions about how she was funding such a lavish lifestyle.

A few days later the 20-year-old's boyfriend, Mr Wang, resigned from his post at China Red Cross Bo'ai Asset Management Ltd, a commercial company that organises charity activities on behalf of the Society.

The head of the company, Weng Tao, blogged on Monday that Ms Guo was not a manager at Bo'ai or at the Red Cross, and that her luxury items had been gifts from her partner.

The revelation made Mr Wang unfit to serve on the board because the scandal had hurt the company's credibility, Mr Weng told the China Daily.

The Red Cross Society has made several announcements on its website distancing itself from Ms Guo since the story broke online and was picked up by the mainstream Chinese media.

The scandal raised questions about corruption in the Red Cross and other charities in China, including those run by the state.
The government places the Red Cross in the lead of charity drives during disasters, and it is one of the few charities generally allowed to solicit public donations.

An editorial in the China Daily said a lack of transparency in the use of charity donations has long been a matter of concern to the public.
It said in April, the Red Cross' Shanghai branch spent nearly 10,000 yuan (£960; $1,547) on a dinner for just 17 people, which caused widespread public anger when the bill was posted online.

"The charity needs to first conduct an investigation into the entire incident and then tell the public what its commercial organisation has done, whether it has made profits and how the profits, if any, have been used," the editorial said.
"Then it needs to think hard about how it can rebuild its credibility."
 
This Friday, the Chinese Communist Party will celebrate its 90th anniversary. But, so far, it doesn’t seem to be enjoying itself.
Sure, the party has organized giant “red song” sing-a-longs and a feature-length, star-packed biopic about itself. However, anxiety and paranoia -- the hallmarks of the party's most recent anniversaries and meetings -- are threatening to smother the celebration.

This is obvious to those who follow the enduringly hot, 24-hour-a-day “democracy wars” on the country’s Twitter-like microblogs. It is also obvious to those who routinely read the highly consequential battle of editorialists (many of whom are proxies for national leaders) in party mouthpieces like People’s Daily.

Outsiders shouldn’t expect to see American-style television debate clashes in China. Like Chinese society itself, Chinese political culture approaches subjects indirectly, and often metaphorically. This is by necessity: Although China’s news media environment is becoming, bit by bit, more open, direct criticism of the party is still off limits. That doesn't mean, however, that you can't indirectly critique the powers that be; you just need a metaphor, a symbol, to help you do it.

Enter "Guo Meimei Baby," a 20-year-old blogger, talent show champion and aspiring actress with an account on the Sina Weibo microblog. On June 21, the young provocateur (and plastic surgery recipient, according to Chinese netizens who looked into the matter) posted images of herself posing with her Maserati, her Lamborghini, her expensive handbags, and her sprawling villa.
The images alone wouldn't have been terribly noteworthy by the standards of China’s internet discourse, but Guo Meimei Baby, for reasons known only to her and her gods, identified herself as a business manager at the "Red Cross Business Association." While there is an active Red Cross Society of China, the Red Cross Business Association doesn't exist. Yet that detail was lost on the outraged netizens who flocked to Guo MeiMei’s Weibo account to get a look at the miscreant who dared to convert charitable contributions into personal luxuries.

Just as the Guo Meimei controversy began, China’s National Audit Office announced that the Red Cross Society of China had engaged in financial improprieties including the misappropriation of funds. (Disclosure: in October 2010, I was paid by the Red Cross Society of China to write an article that appeared in their internal publications). Chinese citizens are already skeptical of philanthropies; the Red Cross, which is officially overseen by the government, has publicly denied the allegation, attributing any irregularities to an accounting mistake, and has vowed to become more transparent with its financial data.

Nonetheless, the audit and Guo Meimei Baby's microblog provided Chinese netizens with the perfect platform to express their growing frustration over general income inequality, official corruption and social divisions within China -- without having to attack the party directly. These are themes that already dominate China’s microblogs, when they’re not focused on soap operas and sports.

Take, for example, this protest from Li Huisheng, a user of the Sina Weibo microblog: “My salary is low for I am not competent, I know it! Banquets at public expense, I am not qualified to attend, I also know it! But you are using the charitable money I pinched and scraped to buy cars, houses and play with women! I will not agree!!!”

Li’s protest could just as easily apply to multiple party scandals that appear regularly in official and independent Chinese media. This was not lost on the officials who supervise and censor China’s internet. While Li's comment did not disappear (or become “harmonized,” in the local parlance) from Weibo's site, many like it did.

Party censors also didn't quell the voice of Li Chengpeng -- a commentator, writer, and daring independent candidate for a local assembly in Sichuan Province -- who blogged on Sina Weibo about the social conditions that might have caused the scandal. He wrote: “The story told by Guo Meimei isn’t about a silly showy girl, but is rather about the bankruptcy of a country's credibility...I know that the Red Cross Society enjoys minister-level treatment on the level of some state-owned companies. It is possible for those state-owned enterprises to go bankrupt, but never the credibility of a country.”

The Communist Party, ever jealous in its role of benevolent provider, only reluctantly allows foreign charities to operate in China. The act of giving to charities, too, is still relatively new for common Chinese citizens, who have concerns that donations ultimately end up in the wrong pockets. In recent years, some of those concerns have faded, especially after the catastrophic 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, for which the Red Cross organized recovery operations. But fears that corruption has tainted Chinese philanthropy, just as it has tainted Chinese politics and government, are ubiquitous.

Two days before the party's 90th anniversary celebrations, Guangzhou’s Southern Metropolis Daily came as close as any major Chinese news outlet to pointing out that the Red Cross scandal has legs only because it mirrors corruption at other levels of Chinese society:

...Nearly all charitable organizations keep relations too close to government departments. Sometimes they even become a subsidiary body of administrative department ... they might hand over funds donated by people to the control of local government, leaving people no way to know the exact direction their contribution takes.

On the other hand, the relationship between charitable organizations and commercial organizations and for-profit activities is generally too intimate ... For example, many senior executives who are working in enterprises have deeply gotten involved in the management activities of charitable organizations and the nature of their activities is quite suspicious.

During the run-up to the anniversary, China’s newspapers have been painted red, literally, with triumphalist editorials that could have run during the Cultural Revolution. This includes one in the People's Daily by Li Jingtian, executive vice president of the Central Committee’s Party School, who reminded interested readers that “The Party is a mature Marxist ruling party that is good at mobilizing the enthusiasm, initiative and creativity of the public.”

But Li’s editorial, like similar pieces running in Chinese newspapers, conveyed traces of anxiety and insecurity, suggesting that some reassurance from history was necessary. Li continued:
Before the collapse of the Soviet Union, a Russian newspaper had launched a survey "Who the Communist Party of the Soviet Union represents?" The results showed that 85 percent of respondents believed the Communist Party of the Soviet Union represented the interests of party bureaucrats and cadres and only 7 percent of respondents believed that the Communist Party of the Soviet Union represented the interests of the working people. A political party will inevitably lose its power if it does not represent the interests of the masses. This is a thought-provoking lesson.

Li, unsurprisingly, concluded that the Chinese Communist Party represents, and has always represented, the interests of the people.
China’s netizens, however, are not always so sure. The Red Cross scandal has provided an ideal opportunity for them to wonder aloud if some oversight is in order, if not from the media, or the democratic masses, then from foreigners.
On Weibo, writer Xia Shang, puts the issue succinctly: “The Red Cross Society of China and every kind of foundation set up by the government must invite international independent auditing organizations to examine them, and their accounts must be shown to all the people. If we cannot achieve this goal, all the other things are useless.”

It’s a jarring opinion, especially for leaders on the verge of celebrating the 90th anniversary of their party -- one that that gained legitimacy, to some degree, by vanquishing foreigners and their meddling ways from China. When it comes to the Red Cross, at least, the implication is clear: The Communist Party can’t always be trusted, anymore. This, too, is a thought-provoking lesson.
 

[ 此帖被yuanyuan在2011-07-08 17:21重新编辑 ]
learn to fail or fail to learn
回复 引用
举报 顶端
lesly 离线
never lose your heart before lose.
级别: 游侠
显示用户信息 
UID: 2466
精华: 0
发帖: 2
铜币: 2 枚
威望: 0 点
贡献值: 0 点
银元: 0 个
在线时间: 0(时)
注册时间: 2012-02-21
最后登录: 2012-02-23
沙发  发表于: 02-21   
只看该作者 ┊  小 中 大
it's a sadness to hear that.
回复 引用
举报 顶端
davidwqqi 离线
级别: 游侠
显示用户信息 
UID: 1126
精华: 0
发帖: 28
铜币: 29 枚
威望: 8 点
贡献值: 0 点
银元: 0 个
在线时间: 11(时)
注册时间: 2010-10-24
最后登录: 2012-05-21
板凳  发表于: 02-22   
只看该作者 ┊  小 中 大
too long to read for the people who are busy . simple and short  is better for the article i think.
thanks
回复 引用
举报 顶端
傅老师 离线
级别: 总版主
显示用户信息 
UID: 2
精华: 0
发帖: 641
铜币: 642 枚
威望: 42 点
贡献值: 0 点
银元: 0 个
在线时间: 232(时)
注册时间: 2010-01-13
最后登录: 2012-05-22
地板  发表于: 02-22   
只看该作者 ┊  小 中 大
引用
引用第2楼davidwqqi于2012-02-22 00:02发表的  :
too long to read for the people who are busy . simple and short  is better for the article i think.
thanks  

Miss Guo did a good job in defaming Red Cross China, do you know that?
回复 引用
举报 顶端
davidwqqi 离线
级别: 游侠
显示用户信息 
UID: 1126
精华: 0
发帖: 28
铜币: 29 枚
威望: 8 点
贡献值: 0 点
银元: 0 个
在线时间: 11(时)
注册时间: 2010-10-24
最后登录: 2012-05-21
4楼  发表于: 02-27   
只看该作者 ┊  小 中 大
i did not read her article carefully and i miss her point i think .
sorry
回复 引用
举报 顶端
上一主题下一主题
 维奥小镇 » 英语角English Corner
描述
快速回复

限 90 字节
如果您在写长篇帖子又不马上发表,建议存为草稿
进入高级模式
加粗 字体颜色 背景颜色 插入链接 图片
验证问题:
上海外教网主办的广播听力网站叫什么? 正确答案:飞达广播网
按"Ctrl+Enter"直接提交
上一个 下一个
      • 清除Cookies
      • 意见反馈
      • 管理员博客
      • 论坛顶部
      Total 0.100212(s) query 3, Time:05-23 16:08, Gzip enabled.
      Powered by PHPWind v7.5 SP3 Honored by 上海外教网